Kontestasi Identitas Islam Moderat di Asia Tenggara
Keywords:
competition, identity, foreign policy, Indonesia, MalaysiaAbstract
In Southeast Asia, there are two countries with a Muslim majority population. Those are Indonesia and Malaysia. In recent years, both of them show their moderate Islamic identity in their foreign policy. Basically, Indonesia is not a country that based on Islam, though their Muslim population is the largest in Southeast Asia and the world. Meanwhile, Malaysia is identically an Islamic state. In order to get better understanding of the reflection of moderate Islamic identity in both countries, this paper uses qualitative methods within the framework of a comparative study. The result of research show that global war on terror has led contestation moderate Islamic identity between Indonesia and Malaysia. Those two largest Muslim countries in Southeast Asia had not previously been vying to show moderate Islamic identity. The other result of this study is both Indonesia and Malaysia have domestic modal of moderate Islamic character where the imaging applications in the realm of foreign policy have done differently. Representation of moderate Islamic identity was associated with the achievements of both countries to get closer to the West and the Islamic world.
References
Buku
Bhutto, Benazir. Reconciliation: Islam, Democracy, and the West. London: Simon and Schuster, 2008.
Fitriani, Evi. “Evolusi Hubungan Indonesia-Malaysia”, dalam Hubungan Indonesia-Malaysia dalam Perspektif Sosial, Budaya, Negara, dan Media: Kasus Perbatasan dan Pekerja Migran. Jakarta: UI Press, 2012.
Jervis, Robert. “Identity and the Cold War”, dalam Melvyn P. Leffler dan Odd Arne Wested (ed.). The Cold War Vol. II: Crises and Détente. London: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Kedourie, Ellie. Democracy and Arab Political Culture. Washington DC: Washington Institute for Near East Studies, 1992.
Nair, Shanti. Islam in Malaysian Foreign Policy. London: Routledge, 1997.
Rabasa, Angel M. et al. Building Moderate Network. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2007.
Rabasa, Angel M. et al. The Muslim World after 9/11. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2004.
Shadid, W. dan P.S. van Koningsveld. Religious Freedom and the Neutrality of the State: The Position of Islam in the European Union. Lauven: Peeters. 2002.
Sheikh, Naved S. The New Politics of Islam: Pan-Islamic Foreign Policy in a World of States. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003.
Sjahrir. Transisi Menuju Indonesia Baru. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2004.
Stanger, Alison. “Democratization and the International System: The Foreign Policies of Interim Governments”, dalam Yossi dan Juan Linz (ed.). Between States: Interim Governments and Democratic Transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1955.
Sukma, Rizal. Islam in Indonesian Foreign Policy. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003.
Suryokusumo, Sumaryo. Praktik Diplomasi. Jakarta: STIH IBLAM, 2004.
Vermonte, Philips J. “Demokratisasi dan Kebijakan Luar Negeri Indonesia: Membangun Citra Diri”, dalam Bantarto Bandoro (ed.). Mencari Desain Baru Kebijakan Luar Negeri Indonesia. Jakarta: Centre for Strategic and Internatonal Studies, 2005.
Viotti, Paul R. dan Mark V. Kauppi. International Relations Theory. Fourth Edition. New York: Longman, 2010.
Viotti, Paul R. dan Mark V. Kauppi. International Relations and World Politics: Security, Economy, Identity. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007.
Jurnal
Anwar, Dewi Fortuna. “Foreign Policy, Islam, and Democracy in Indonesia”. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol. 3 (2010), hal. 37-54.
Humphryes, Andrew. “Malaysia Post-9/11 Security Strategy: Winning Hearts and Minds or Legitimising the Political Status Quo”. Kajian Malaysia, Vol. 28, No. 1 (2010), hal. 21-52.
Nogués, Elisabeth Johansson. “Is the EU’s Foreign Policy Identity an Obstacle? The European Union, the Northen Dimension and the Union for Mediterranean”. European Political Economy Review, No. 9 (2009), hal. 24-48.
Sukma, Rizal. “Mengelola Paradoks: Identitas, Citra, dan Posisi Internasional Indonesia”. Analisis CSIS, Vol. 39, No. 4 (2010).
Tan, Paige Johnson. “Navigating a Turbulent Ocean: Indonesia's Worldview and Foreign Policy”. Asian Perspective, Vol. 31, No. 3 (2007), hal. 147-181.
Thaib, Fachry. “Implikasi Gejolak Politik Timur Tengah terhadap Kepentingan Ekonomi Indo-nesia”. Jurnal Diplomasi, Vol. 3, No. 2 (2011), hal. 35-42.
Wendt, Alexander. “Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics”. International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 2 (1992), hal. 391-425.
Dokumen Lain
International Monetary Fund. Direction of Trade Statistics Yearbook 2006. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund, 2006.
Lee, Mathew. “Clinton: Indonesia Can be Democratic Role Model”. The Jakarta Post (24 Juli 2011).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Lelly Andriasanti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.